why cant we see remains of lander which was smashed in to moon 40 kms from blast off site or moon buggy
Debunkers are skeptics of nothing and will never question any mainstream narrative. They are a fraud and often a part of efforts in attempt to control public opinion. Sponsored activity on the internet is commonplace today. In a world of corruption, there are no conspiracies.
The problem I have with this sort of programme is that the genuine flaws in NASA's case are systematically ignored in favour of relative trivia (such as 'was the film 'enhanced/faked' ).Fact 1.
In order to reach the moon, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and all the others would have had to travel straight through the Van Allen Belt twice (once on the way out and once on the way back).
Neil Armstrong reached the ripe old age of 82yrs, Buzz Aldrin is currently 88yrs old and still seemingly in good health; so ….. ?
logic says they didn't suffer much harm from the Van Allen Belt radiation.
With that fact in mind, why is NASA stating publicly today (you can listen to the NASA scientist saying this in the videos shown below) that although they can send unmanned craft through the Van Allen Belt with 'relative' ease; they're loath to expose living astronauts to that radiation due to the potentially very serious health risks ?
Nasa admits humans can't pass through the dangerous Van …
16/11/2015 · Nasa put out a video explaining the Orion Mission, in this video he admits how dangerous the Van Allen Belts are for humans, so obviously it would not have been possible over 45 years ago.
Author: Hallelujah Girl
NASA Admits They Can't Send Humans Through The Van Allen …
19/03/2015 · NASA Admits They Can't Send Humans Through The Van Allen Radiation Belts Jordon Rains … NASA Finds Vast Ocean on Jupiter's Moon … NASA's Van Allen Probes Discover Third Belt Around Earth …
Author: Jordon Rains
Fact 2.If it was possible for humans to pass through the Van Allen Belt with the relatively primitive technology available fifty years ago, it should be equally possible today.
The only alternative is that in reality as opposed to 1960s Cold War propaganda, no human astronauts were ever sent through the Van Allen Belt. This could have been achieved by sending the crewed component of the mission into a low Earth orbit (similar to those now occupied by the Space Station/communications satellites etc….. ) with the then unmanned section of the mission continuing on through the Van Allen radiation to orbit and send back messages/pre-recorded film etc ….. from the moon for public consumption.
Desperate boomer "moonies". Give it up. We didn't go.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6WAuXjQDoohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0n-9dfbvBwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXBDHQVGdlM
Debunking a conspiracy with a modelled scene; brillant.
I personally would like my stolen taxpayers money back, it's misappropriation of taxpayers funds, money is being used in other area's of military, and a group savings account for the one's in control to dip into as they please..
hilarious folks can still imagine free masons traveled to the moon 6 times over 3 years with experimental 1960's technology, landed successfully 6 times, built experimental dune buggies, an drove around on the moon, played golf on the moon, then launched from the surface of the moon traveling 7 miles per second, without any gps system managed to rendezvous successfully 6 times over 3 years when being off a fraction of a degree would not possible return them to earth, the whole narrative is absurd, then nasa rather than providing live feeds had the images projected on a screen which the news then recaptured with another camera further degrading the quality, then nasa lost the telemetry data, an intentionally destroyed the plans for the rockets, an elderly buzz aldrin cracked under questioning in this interview briefly an admits that they didn't go, /watch?v=Y4UP6nRMuGs but you folks all still retardedly acting like America sent secret society free masons to the moon, truly amazing. American government gives nasa enough money to end world hunger saving over 100 million people from starving to death since 9/11/2001, but instead of saying hey maybe conceptually instead of sending secret society free masons to the moon, maybe America should focus on saving 100 million people from starving to death on the earth, maybe 100 million people are more important than faking a moon mission, maybe America could be proud of actually ending world hunger instead of sending secret society free masons on the moon? But no instead I have to deal with retardedlyevil people. Buzz cracks 7 minutes into this video under questioning about the moon mission, an basically admits he thinks the government needed money to develop icbm's so they faked a moon mission. /watch?v=Y4UP6nRMuGs
It's not the light or shadow,, it's the cardboard model..
Why don't you revisit the moon and prove everything, Simple!
moon landing, my ass.
Let another nation land on the same spot so we know for sure if it was a hoax or not but I don't know what to believe until then
Wow, they are desperate.It was faked, bottom line.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sUUe2cLZNc&feature=share
It has to do with the luminosity of the moon. It's reflecting so much light that even in the shadows he's lit enough for the picture to look stunning.
5:10 "…so essentialy Neil Amstrong himself was a light source in that SCENE…"
Wow that was a long as for how to debunk a fake not being a fake by faking it is the debunking video suppose to play now that add for video game is over 😕
Fake moon landing !!!
Conspiracy theorists are just people who have nothing better to do than try to disprove everyone.
Why didn't you tell us this 45 years ago ?
rumor has it that the cameraman who filmed the first step on the moon and the take off of the moon is still there.he will be collected when they go back in 2020.
What Would Tom Brady Say?Take a Tom Brady football having only 5 psi. . While Tom will have a better grip, it will be impossible to bend or change the shape of the football. . Try it. The same restriction will occur in the suit of an astronaut and you cannot avoid it. .
Why is Our Michelin Man Devoid of Pressurization?Suit technology has not reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking and working while in a vacuum. Pressure within the suit would cause great restriction while no pressurization was apparent at any time for the astronauts. At 5 psi pressure is cumulative over hundreds of square inches within the suit. The leg of an astronaut's suit contains a minimum of 400 square inches of suit material. This translates into a total force of 2000 lbs. exerted in all directions. If only 1/10 of that force is working against movement away from the shape formed under pressure, this amounts to 200 lbs. of restriction. If we reduce this to a mere 1/20 of total force exerted under pressure, the astronaut will experience 100 lbs. of restriction against movement that will continue to cause great difficulty when walking. The alternative is to walk very stiffly and awkwardly with little movement of limbs with the risk of falling. Once fallen, it would be impossible to recover one's feet with the inability to bend either knees or torso sufficiently.
@ 4:55 That´s NOT Armstrong because as that Astronaut jumps off the Ladder, one sees clearly his Right Fingers coming into view of that Bright Light!! It´s reflecting something else! @ 7:14 There U have it!! That´s how NASA´s been filming the MOON, MARS and esa, ISS Stations!! All Hoax and Fake!
LOL LOL can not believe that lot people think it was a fake deal Well Well I hope they don't think the moon is a fake thing you see in sky night. Oh Oh, that might work for the next Conspiracy thinkers the MOON is a fake thing in the sky. Also, I like to see if anybody on Earth takes photos of the stars during the daylight. it is not going to happen. been taking pictures for a long time, I guess the people think there should be seeing stars Yes on the backside of the moon but not on the bright space sky during the moons daylight hours.. Give me a break on the moon landing was a fake Get a life it did happen and we be on Mars in the next 10 years.
Fake moon, fake lander,
That is really funny they can not be photoshopped in 1969 or stage but they will try to say it is and why I like to know let me or tell me why they keep up this dum conspiracy anyway. And A man on Moon and next is Mars and will happen in the next 10 years. and everyone has a great day .
what a boring vid 😒
No one believes this rubbish
100 % fake. NASA is a free masonary organisation .
William S Burroughs on the moon landing…."THANKS FOR THE LAST & GREATEST BETRAYAL OF THE LAST & GREATEST OF HUMAN DREAMS. " Land of the Deceived , home of the slave.
So the earth has an atmosphere and we can see the stars, but the moon has no atmosphere and the moon men can't see the stars. All you space cadets should know that by now. Stars are only visible through atmosphere. 🙂
Try debunking this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCHG6uJH5L8&t=274s
useless to comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.